COURT FINDS COMMERCIAL
The plaintiff, Cook & Associates Realty, Inc., a licensed real estate brokerage company in the State of New York, initiated this action for brokerage commissions allegedly due and owing as a result of locating commercial space on behalf of the defendant Christopher Chestnutt, the principal of Teddy’s International d/b/a EL-Teddy. Mr. Chestnutt and the principal of EL-Ray entered into a membership purchase agreement providing that Mr. Chestnutt purchased a controlling interest in L-Ray, would be the sole manager of EL-Ray and assume EL-Ray’s lease. Plaintiff initiated this action for breach of contract arguing that it was owed a commission pursuant to the agreement signed between itself and EL Teddy since Mr. Chestnutt obtained a new space and lease for a restaurant. Plaintiff also argued that Mr. Chestnutt was personally liable for all commissions owed. The court indicated that the elements of a cause of action for breach of contract are (1) formation of a contract between plaintiff and defendant; (2) performance by plaintiff; (3) defendant’s failure to perform; and (4) resulting damage. Plaintiff agreed that it was a party to a contract between Cook & Associates Realty, the brokerage firm and EL-Teddy’s, the restaurant. The commission agreement executed between the parties provided that if plaintiff succeeded in assisting EL-Teddy’s in acquiring new space or purchase of new space plaintiff would receive a commission. EL-Teddy’s did not acquire a new lease or new space through plaintiff or anyone else for that matter. The court therefore determined that plaintiff was not owed a commission from EL-Teddy’s, Teddy’s International or Christopher Chestnutt. During the course of the trial, the broker argued that even though the commission agreement was between the brokerage firm and EL-Teddy’s, Mr. Chestnutt signed a document and therefore may be held personally liable. The court did not agree. The commission agreement was between two corporate entities. “A corporate officer signing a contract for a corporation cannot be held personally liable, absent direct and explicit evidence of an actual intent to be personally liable. It is well known in the State of New York that a corporation exists independently of its owners as a separate legal entity and as a result, owners are not normally liable for the deaths of the corporation. Although the broker did introduce the principal of EL-Ray to Mr. Chestnutt with the hopes that EL- Teddy’s would acquire the EL-Ray lease, no such transaction took place. At the trial, the broker argued that the membership purchase agreement provided Mr. Chestnutt with a lease for a new space and therefore Mr. Chestnutt owed plaintiff a commission pursuant to agreement with Teddy’s International. The court countered that Mr. Chestnutt entered into the membership purchase agreement in his individual capacity and not on behalf of Teddy’s International d/b/a EL-Teddy’s. Mr. Chestnutt purchased controlling shares in L-Ray and by virtue of his purchase, acquired the L-Ray lease. The lease was and continued to be L-Ray and no other entity. The court dismissed the action against all defendants finding no real estate brokerage commission was due and owing. Cook & Associates Realty Inc. v. Chestnutt, Supreme Court, New York County (NYLJ 9/2/2008)
Visit our website at CFGNY.com for copies of recent articles as well as other areas of interest to the real estate community.
|
||||